Some billboards are going up in Cleveland promoting abortion. Now, I’m used to the typical lines like “It’s my body” and so on. I can at least understand the confusion with ideas like that; the proponent assumes that just because something is inside one’s body, then it is one’s body. My response is simple – get a DNA test done on the baby (or fetus if you prefer), and if it comes up identical to your DNA, go for it. You would have my blessing to proceed with an abortion, for it would simply be part of your body. Of course, that is an impossibility, for the mother only provides half the chromosomes to the fetus. Therefore it is impossible for it to be part of the mother’s body. From within moments of conception, the baby is a genetically distinct human. But these new billboards are so brazen in their disinformation, that they require a response. The billboards simply show a short fill-in-the-blank sentence, “abortion is _____”, with the blank filled in with one of 16 different false conclusions. As the tragic anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches this month, and we mourn the loss of nearly 60 million Americans over the last 45 years, let’s look at the first 8 of these faulty arguments this week, and the remaining 8 next week.
- “Abortion is normal. “ The word “normal” can have a technical meaning in fields like statistics and engineering, but in everyday usage, normal means regular, common, or natural. Induced abortions ended approximately 19% of pregnancies in the US in 2014. Clearly, the regular, natural result of a pregnancy, if not interrupted, is childbirth, not abortion.
- “Abortion is necessary. “ Abortion is certainly not necessary, in general. If the human race is to continue to survive, childbirth is necessary, but not abortion. I’m guessing – hoping – they are referring to the specific cases where the mother’s life is in imminent danger. Is there any other case where the idea of a necessary death could even be contemplated? Even when presented with the apparent need to kill one to save the other, versus losing both, it is still a decision of last resort arrived at after exhausting other options. But those cases are the exception even in times and places of poor medical care. In light of current medical advances, there are becoming fewer and fewer cases where a nonabortive solution can’t be found. The primary case is ectopic (tubal) pregnancy, which is an almost guaranteed death sentence for both mother and child if allowed to proceed, although even in that dire situation, there are a handful of cases where mother and baby both survived an ectopic pregnancy (with 3 in the UK between 1999 and 2005). However, these are an extremely small percentage of abortions. If this is the scenario pro-abortion activists want to appeal to, then OK; let’s ban all abortions except where it is actually necessary. Since the vast majority of abortions are elective, I suspect the argument for necessity is simply a bluff needing to be called.
- “Abortion is your right. “ While abortion or a right to privacy are never mentioned in our Constitution or Declaration of Independence, the right to life is recognized and protected in both documents. But since the abortion supporters bring up the subject of rights, it’s worth reminding everyone of something R.C. Sproul used to say: nobody has the right to do what is wrong. It’s also been said in various ways since the 1800’s that the right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins. Rights come with responsibilities, and if your right to do something is reasonably restricted when it would only harm another person, how much more should that alleged “right” be restricted when it would kill an innocent person?
- “Abortion is gender equality. “ This is an interesting one because sex-selective abortion kills more females than males worldwide. After years of preferentially aborting baby girls, areas like China and India are beginning to see substantial deficits in the number of women compared to men. Just from a practical standpoint, it really makes no sense for feminist women to support a procedure that actually kills more women than men worldwide. But then today’s feminists aren’t like the real pioneering feminists who were staunchly opposed to abortion.
- Abortion is a family value. “ To say that killing a family member is somehow a family value is simply bewildering. Enough said.
- “Abortion is good medicine. “ Actually, abortion violates the Hippocratic Oath, from whence we get that most basic, founding medical principle of “Do no harm,” the idea that doctors should be about healing their patients, not harming them. But perhaps you might think Hippocrates was only referring to those who had been born. After all, he did live 2400 years ago and couldn’t possibly know what we know now about babies from genetics and embryology (which has only strengthened the argument against abortion, by the way). You might be tempted to think that, except that Hippocrates specifically prohibited a doctor from performing abortions in his famous Oath. Yes, it was bad medicine back then, and it’s even clearer now that things like ultrasound have opened a window into the womb.
- “Abortion is safer than childbirth. “ This is based on the presupposition that the mother is the only patient involved. When we correctly understand that the unborn baby is a living human person, then we understand that every successful abortion kills at least one of the patients (and sometimes both).
- “Abortion is a blessing. “ This is perhaps the most selfish of all the billboard slogans, for depriving someone of their very life, without their consent, is only a blessing if you don’t want that person alive. This slogan perverts the traditional view of children as a blessing and substitutes their death as the blessing.
Abortion is often a sensitive and emotional subject, but that is because the stakes are so high. It’s either no big deal and all these billboards trying to justify it are needless, or the human race has killed 1.4 billion of its most defenseless members without provocation – just since 1980  – and it’s actually the most important issue facing humanity. There really is no in-between. If the unborn baby is a living human person, innocent of any wrongdoing, then abortion is murder, and abortionists are not doctors but serial killers. And if we continue to ignore the holocaust happening right in front of us, our generation will be just as shamed in future history books as the households of American slave owners and the Germans who lived near the Nazi death camps and looked the other way.
 Preamble to the US Declaration of Independence, and the 14th amendment to the US Constitution.
 See www.numberofabortions.com for more tragic abortion stats.
One thought on “Normalizing Murder, Part 1”
I’d like to address some feedback received on this post. I referred to the unborn human as a “baby”, and said “or fetus if you prefer”. I really don’t mind if abortion supporters want to use “fetus”, because that is an accurate term for the majority of the pregnancy. But the term “baby” was seen by one reader as a strictly emotional appeal instead of the “proper” scientific term of “fetus”. Allow me to clarify something. Fetus is the name of a particular stage of development in a human. It’s not when they’re an adult, and it’s not when they’re an adolescent. Rather it’s the time from the 9th week after conception up to birth of the human baby.[Langman’s Medical Embryology, 11th Ed., p.91] The zygote does not transform into some new creature called an embryo, that then transforms into a fetus, that then magically becomes a baby once it exits the birth canal; there is continuity of identity as it passes through the different stages of zygote, embryo, fetus, infant, adolescent, and adult.
Also, for those who think the term fetus helps separate the unborn from “actual babies”, consider what distinguishes the fetal stage of life: almost all body parts the child will have as an adult are formed by this point. Your heart and brain and ears and stomach and so on are still forming in the embryonic stage, but the fetus has 4,000 out of the 4,500 body parts an adult has at the start of the fetal stage. That’s almost 90%. All of those various parts will continue growing and developing after that 9th week, but their presence is why we mark a milestone at the beginning of the 9th week (after fertilization). So, when you refer to an unborn human as a fetus, all you do is highlight just how far from a “clump of cells” that baby really is. Of course there’s also the fact that the American Heritage Dictionary lists “an unborn child; a fetus” as one of the definitions for “baby”, so even without going into detail on this issue, I don’t really think I’m out in left field with calling it a baby. Hopefully, that helps clarify things for any others questioning that term. Thanks!